Saturday, February 27, 2021

Den of Vipers: Federal Reserve Easy Funny Money, MMT, Dollar/Currency Collapse (VIDEO)

Watch video: 
RUMBLE || BRIGHTEON

Communiqué for the Day Feb. 27, 2021: The Federal Reserve central bank is enabling out of control government spending. Easy money will result in massive inflation, which will impact your standard of living.  

** BOOK  Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy available on Amazon 

Cynthia F. Hodges, JD, LLM, MA is an attorney (WA) and the author of Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy (Auriga Books). 

Pen name: Tina Foster 

Website: cynthiahodges.com 

Blogs: leadershipbygeorge.blogspot.com, plasticmacca.blogspot.com

_____________________________________________


Cynthia F. Hodges, JD, LLM, MA
Attorney at Law

Website: cynthiahodges.com


Juris Doctor: South Texas College of Law (Houston, TX)

LLM (Environmental Law): Lewis and Clark Law School (Portland, OR)

Masters of Arts (Germanic Studies): The University of Texas at Austin

Law License: Washington State


Friday, February 26, 2021

Den of Vipers: Great Reset, Bank Bail-ins, Gold Confiscation (VIDEO)

Watch Video: RUMBLE || BRIGHTEON

Communiqué for the Day Feb. 26, 2021: Central bankers plan the Great Reset for total control, banks can take your money via the bail-in rule, jewelry is a way to avoid having precious metals seized. 

*** BOOK  Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy available on Amazon 

Cynthia F. Hodges, JD, LLM, MA is an attorney (WA) and the author of Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy (Auriga Books). 

Pen name: Tina Foster 

Website: cynthiahodges.com 

Blogs: leadershipbygeorge.blogspot.com, plasticmacca.blogspot.com

_____________________________________________


Cynthia F. Hodges, JD, LLM, MA
Attorney at Law

Website: cynthiahodges.com


Juris Doctor: South Texas College of Law (Houston, TX)

LLM (Environmental Law): Lewis and Clark Law School (Portland, OR)

Masters of Arts (Germanic Studies): The University of Texas at Austin

Law License: Washington State

Thursday, February 25, 2021

Den of Vipers: Central Banksters are to Blame for Systemic Economic Failure (VIDEO)

 

Watch video: RUMBLE || BRIGHTEON

Communiqué for the Day Feb. 25, 2021: Central bankers have rigged up a fake, phony economy,  they redistribute people's wealth to themselves, but their system is on the verge of  collapse. 

*** BOOK  "Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy" available on Amazon

*** Book description (short video): RUMBLE || BRIGHTEON


_____________________________________________


Cynthia F. Hodges, JD, LLM, MA
Attorney at Law (WA)

Website: cynthiahodges.com


Juris Doctor: South Texas College of Law (Houston, TX)

LLM (Environmental Law): Lewis and Clark Law School (Portland, OR)

Masters of Arts (Germanic Studies): The University of Texas at Austin

Law License: Washington State

Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Peeking Behind the Curtain: Exposing Globalist Bankers & the Great Reset (VIDEO)

Click to watch: RUMBLE || BRIGHTEON

Patriot Resistance Communiqué for the Day Feb. 23, 2021: My new book, Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy, exposes bankers' evil agenda and tactics, what can be done about it, and how you can protect yourself.

 *** BOOK  Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy available on Amazon

*** Book description (short video): RUMBLE || BRIGHTEON


_____________________________________________


Cynthia F. Hodges, JD, LLM, MA
Attorney at Law (WA)

Website: cynthiahodges.com


Juris Doctor: South Texas College of Law (Houston, TX)

LLM (Environmental Law): Lewis and Clark Law School (Portland, OR)

Masters of Arts (Germanic Studies): The University of Texas at Austin

Law License: Washington State

Banking on Corruption: "Den of Vipers" & Central Bank Shenanigans (VIDEO)

Watch video on RUMBLE || BRIGHTEON

Patriot Resistance Communiqué for the Day Feb. 24, 2021: Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy reveals banker secrets - inflation, bitcoin, MMT, Great Reset, etc.

*** BOOK  Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy available on Amazon

*** Book description (short video): RUMBLE || BRIGHTEON


_____________________________________________


Cynthia F. Hodges, JD, LLM, MA
Attorney at Law (WA)

Website: cynthiahodges.com


Juris Doctor: South Texas College of Law (Houston, TX)

LLM (Environmental Law): Lewis and Clark Law School (Portland, OR)

Masters of Arts (Germanic Studies): The University of Texas at Austin

Law License: Washington State


Thursday, January 14, 2021

The United States of America is a “Corporation” - DEBUNKED



The United States of America is a “Corporation” - DEBUNKED


Cynthia F. Hodges, JD, LLM, MA


[Video discussion: Rumble || Youtube || Brighteon]


The false claim that the United States of America is a “corporation” has been spread far and wide on the Internet. In reality, the USA is a constitutional republic. This article sets out to debunk the disinformation, the purpose of which may be to 1) discredit people who repeat it, 2) denigrate the Republic, and/or 3) divide the “Truth Community.”


A constitutional republic is a representative form of government. Its main attributes are 1) there is a constitution that limits the government’s power, and 2) the citizens elect government officials. Both of these are true for the USA. Furthermore, Article IV, Section 4 establishes a republic: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,…” (US Const. Art. IV, sect. 4). In addition, the Pledge of Allegiance, which was codified by 4 U.S. Code § 4, refers to the USA as a republic: “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic, for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”


Unlike a republic, a corporation is a legal entity formed under state law to conduct business (the advantage is that it affords limited liability to the owners). One aspect that sets a corporation apart from a country is its capacity to be sued, whereas the USA enjoys sovereign immunity. The US federal government may not be sued without its consent (the Federal Tort Claims Act has granted permission in some cases). If the USA were a corporation, it would not have sovereign immunity and could be sued. In addition, corporations are not set up as representative governments with a constitution that limits their power. 


Some point to companies registered under names such as “United States Corporation Company” and “United States Inc.” as proof that the USA (country) is a corporation. However, companies may usually choose any name they like (with exceptions) as long as the name is not already taken. They have nothing to do with the country of the USA.


There is also caselaw that refutes the claim that USA is a corporation. In UNITED STATES v. COOPER CORPORATION, 312 US 600, 607 (1941), the Supreme Court wrote in dicta: “We may say in passing that the argument that the United States may be treated as a corporation organized under its own laws, that is, under the Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained as not to merit serious consideration.”


Another source of confusion is the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, which was repealed in 1874 (thus rendering it moot). This Act established a single government for the District of Columbia. Washington, DC. Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution states: “The Congress shall have Power To…exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States.”)  


Some claim that this Organic Act created a new Constitution for the United States by inserting wording for “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” that somehow replaced the original Constitution. This is a fallacy. A secondary Constitution has never been ratified by the states and, thus, would have no effect. In addition, Article VI states that the Constitution - the one actually ratified by the states (see Article VII) - is the “supreme law of the land”: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”


The Constitution cannot be changed by an act of Congress or by treaty (which becomes federal law when ratified). It may only be changed via amendment or by way of a constitutional convention: Article V states: “The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress.” The Supreme Court held in Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803) that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and “that a law repugnant to the constitution is void…” Therefore, any law that purports to change the Constitution has no effect.


Another common misperception stems from the Definitions section of 28 U.S. Code §3002. The text reads: 


As used in this chapter:

(15) “United States” means—

A. a Federal corporation;


The first thing to note is that the definition is limited to that particular chapter (“as used in this chapter”) and does NOT extend beyond it. What this definition means is that the term, ”United States,” may refer to a federal corporation (for ex., the Postal Service), and not that the USA is itself a corporation. 


In conclusion, the US Constitution, federal law, and caselaw establish that the USA is a republic and not a corporation. The USA does not have the features of a corporation, such as the capacity to be sued. Instead, it enjoys sovereign immunity. 


[Video discussion: Youtube || Brighteon]


REFERENCES


Berenson, Tessa. “Here’s Why Washington D.C. Isn't a State.” TIME. N.p., 15 Apr. 2016. Web. 14 Jan. 2021. <https://time.com/4296175/washington-dc-statehood-history/>.


Bogle, Jacob. “United States Inc.” Internet Myths, Lies and Misinformation. N.p., 21 May. 2013. Web. 14 Jan. 2021. <http://internettheories.blogspot.com/2013_05_01_archive.html>.


Content Team. “CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.” Legal Dictionary. N.p., 19 Nov. 2016. Web. 14 Jan. 2021. <https://legaldictionary.net/constitutional-republic/>.


"corporation." A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. 1856. 14 Jan. 2021 https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/corporation


DeMichele, Thomas. “The United States is a Corporation - Myth.” Fact/Myth. N.p., 4 Nov. 2016. Web. 14 Jan. 2021. <http://factmyth.com/factoids/the-united-states-is-a-corporation/?fbclid=IwAR1GoSkmvRz6mxdHI4Eyfpw-lu5A1SKOL4M-5boXOsMT75z-8uWKtQG80Vk>.


“Sovereign immunity.” Cornell Law School. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Jan. 2021. <https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Sovereign_immunity>.


“Text of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871.” The Daily Render. N.p., 30 Jan. 2009. Web. 14 Jan. 2021. <https://www.nikolasschiller.com/blog/index.php/archives/2009/01/30/2215>.



_____________________________



Cynthia F. Hodges, JD LLM MA
Attorney at Law (WA)
Author: Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy
Website: cynthiahodges.com

Juris Doctor: South Texas College of Law (Houston, TX)
LLM (Environmental Law): Lewis and Clark Law School (Portland, OR)
Masters of Arts (Germanic Studies): The University of Texas at Austin

Tuesday, November 24, 2020

Election 2020: Pres. Trump's Duty to Restore a Republican Form of Government

On election night, November 3, 2020, a color revolution was set into motion. A color revolution is a type of coup that combines election fraud with civil unrest. The Deep State/Democrats engaged in massive election fraud that involved Dominion voting machines, sketchy midnight ballot dumps, and various other frauds that are too numerous to list. Evidence can be found at https://hereistheevidence.com, but more will no doubt be revealed in court proceedings. Antifa and BLM agents provocateur were standing by, should the election not go their way. Many businesses in blue cities boarded up their shops in anticipation of riots. The next morning, Biden was in the lead, miraculously surpassing Trump's lead in key swing states the night before. 

By subverting the election, the perpetrators are depriving the states (and citizens) of a republican form of government.  Article IV, Section 4 of the US Constitution states: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…" A republic is a form of government in which a state is ruled by representatives of the citizen body, i.e. we vote to elect government officials. The Deep State is attempting to install Joe Biden as president in opposition to the will of the people. 

The federal government has the duty to restore the republican form of government per the Constitution. President Trump must act. 10 U.S. Code § 253 states: 

"The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—


(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.


In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution."



After the Civil War ended in 1865, the US President was authorized to occupy the former Confederate states with the military in order to restore a republican form of government (TEXAS v. WHITE, 74 U.S. 700 (1868)):


"Congress passed, in March 1867, three certain acts, known as the Reconstruction Acts. By the first of these, reciting that no legal State governments or adequate protection for life or property then existed in the rebel States of Texas, and nine other States named, and that it was necessary that peace and good order should be enforced in them until loyal and republican State governments could be legally established, Congress divided the States named into five military districts (Texas with Louisiana being the fifth), and made it the duty of the President to assign to each an officer of the army, and to detail a sufficient military force to enable him to perform his duties and enforce authority within his district. The act made it the duty of this officer to protect all persons in their rights, to suppress insurrection, disorder, violence, and to punish, or cause to be punished, all disturbers of the public peace and criminals, either through the local civil tribunals or through military commissions, which the act authorized...


106

These new relations imposed new duties upon the United States. The first was that of suppressing the rebellion...


107

The authority for the performance of the first had been found in the power to suppress insurrection and carry on war...


112

In the exercise of the power conferred by the guaranty clause, as in the exercise of every other constitutional power, a discretion in the choice of means is necessarily allowed. It is essential only that the means must be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the power conferred, through the restoration of the State to its constitutional relations, under a republican form of government, and that no acts be done, and no authority exerted, which is either prohibited or unsanctioned by the Constitution.


113

It is not important to review, at length, the measures which have been taken, under this power, by the executive and legislative departments of the National government. It is proper, however, to observe that almost immediately after the cessation of organized hostilities, and while the war yet smouldered in Texas, the President of the United States issued his proclamation appointing a provisional governor for the State, and providing for the assembling of a convention, with a view to the re-establishment of a republican government, under an amended constitution, and to the restoration of the State to her proper constitutional relations. A convention was accordingly assembled, the constitution amended, elections held, and a State government, acknowledging its obligations to the Union, established.


114

Whether the action then taken was, in all respects, warranted by the Constitution, it is not now necessary to determine. The power exercised by the President was supposed, doubtless, to be derived from his constitutional functions, as commander-in-chief; and, so long as the war continued, it cannot be denied that he might institute temporary government within insurgent districts, occupied by the National forces, or take measures, in any State, for the restoration of State government faithful to the Union, employing, however, in such efforts, only such means and agents as were authorized by constitutional laws."


Therefore, there can be no doubt that the President has the authority to take necessary action to restore the republican form of government to the states.


Apart from fraud and various election-interference causes of action, it is my opinion that the following charges could also be levied against those who participated in the color revolution:


18 U.S. Code §2381. Treason 

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.


18 U.S. Code §2383. Rebellion or insurrection 

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.


18 U.S. Code §2384. Seditious conspiracy 

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.


If it turns out that any politician was involved in seditious conspiracy, then he or she is barred from holding office. 


It is my opinion that President Trump should not show the perpetrators any leniency. He should make an example of them, lest some evil-doers feel inclined to steal an election in the future. 


Legal Disclaimer: The above does not constitute legal advice, but is solely the opinion of the author.


_____________________________



Cynthia F. Hodges, JD LLM MA
Attorney at Law (WA)
Author: Den of Vipers: Central Banks & the Fake Economy
Website: cynthiahodges.com

Juris Doctor: South Texas College of Law (Houston, TX)
LLM (Environmental Law): Lewis and Clark Law School (Portland, OR)
Masters of Arts (Germanic Studies): The University of Texas at Austin